Dave Hume

Power systems engineer · Wellington, New Zealand

Twelve years as an academic in power systems at the University of Canterbury. My PhD was on interharmonic cross modulation in HVDC links. Then twenty years in the New Zealand electricity sector: a couple of years consulting to the Electricity Commission first, and the rest at the Electricity Authority, where I work across compliance, monitoring and policy.

The paper below carries the Authority’s affiliation. The views in it are mine, not theirs. Everything else here is my own time.

A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence. David Hume, 1748 — no relation established

Current work

1997–2025 · New Zealand · preprint

From Lagging to Leading

Twenty-nine years of half-hourly metering at New Zealand’s grid exit points, measuring the reactive character of a whole power system. It crosses from lagging to leading around 2016, and most of the drift is on the demand side.

The likely mechanism is the mandated EMC filter inside every switched-mode power supply, though that is a hypothesis and the paper labels it as one. The inputs are records any system operator already holds, so the measurement should travel.

2009–2025 · 29 distributors · companion to the paper

NZ Power Factor Explorer

Power factor across all 29 New Zealand electricity distribution businesses, from public EMI data. Sixteen years of it, plotted so you can watch the reactive power drift network by network.

2026 · Rasuwa, Nepal · ongoing

The Trishuli Investigation

An independent physics analysis of the Langtang Lirung collapse of 26 August 2026, and the flood it sent down the Lhende Khola, the Bhote Koshi and the Trishuli. Reported elsewhere as the Bhote Koshi flood. As at 8 September, 1,342 people were confirmed dead in Nepal and 4,886 missing, with 43 dead and 519 missing on the Chinese side. Every figure is provisional.

One narrow question: where did the water actually come from? I think it was largely already in the river. Melting ice is expensive and falling is cheap, so the fall cannot supply the ~20 Mm³ officially recorded as excess. That part is an energy budget, not a model.

How big the collapse itself was is a harder question and I have not answered it. The early estimate is under revision and looks too small, seven versions of the routing model have failed the tests I set them, and it may end up withdrawn rather than resolved.

Scar · 4,928 m Devghat · 186 m
Channel long section, 199 km, from the project’s own routing data.

Still going, so treat the size numbers as working numbers rather than results. Five findings retracted in the first week and more corrected since, including one where I quoted a figure with a precision the source never claimed. All of them still up, with the reasons and the dates.

Off the clock

Rogaines and adventure racing these days, mostly in the South Island. Before that a lot of caving, quite a bit of it genuine exploration in the deep parts of New Zealand’s biggest systems, where the map runs out. Cave search and rescue too. Pipi the dog comes to the training but not the races.

Elsewhere

  • GitHub — djhume
  • LinkedIn — the formal version
  • ORCID — the back catalogue, 1998 on
  • Strava — the evidence for the paragraph above